<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Helioid &#187; semantic web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.helioid.com/tag/semantic-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.helioid.com</link>
	<description>Search Refined</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:02:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Intentional Web</title>
		<link>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/the-intentional-web/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/the-intentional-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intentional web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helioid.net/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The majority of the time one browses or searches the web there is a goal in mind.  Find the location of a coffee shop, learn more about cloud computing, see if there are any interesting new movies, be distracted and procrastinate.  Each of these instances of web use has objectives and implicitly defines a success predicate.  When one (the agent) interacts with the web, a computer or simply information (the system), that systems knowledge or discovery of an explicit representation of the agent's objectives, and the success predicates for these objectives, greatly enhances its capability to assist the agent in accomplishing its objectives.
<img class="aligncenter" title="Search Agent" src="http://d.helioid.com/images/search_agent.png" alt="" width="269" height="197" />
The intentional web is a community of agents interacting with each other to accomplish their goals and increase their fitness.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/the-intentional-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kosmix and the Semantic Web</title>
		<link>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/kosmix-and-the-semantic-web/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/kosmix-and-the-semantic-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 04:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kosmix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helioid.net/?p=51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just recently ran across an "interview":http://www.beet.tv/2008/06/kosmix-topical.html with Anand Rajaraman, founder of Kosmix, and something that was said toward the end of the interview piqued my interest.  The subject of the Semantic Web came up, the existence of which Anand claimed would far more likely be brought about by apps "mining intelligence" out of the internet's squall of information, rather than the universal adoption of a common semantic ontology like RFL.  We certainly agree with that, as we believe that the winners of the race to establish the next generation of web search will be the ones who mine intelligence the most efficiently.  However, something stuck in my craw about Kosmix being held up as an example of the various expeditions presently being made in this general direction.  Which isn't to say that I think Kosmix is not on such an expedition, but rather that I seem to be feeling the same vague perturbation I felt when I first made an expedition of my own through the flurry of noise on Kosmix, after hearing about the explorative experience supported by their search engine.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.helioid.com/2009/02/kosmix-and-the-semantic-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yes, Keyword Search is About to Hit its Breaking Point</title>
		<link>http://blog.helioid.com/2008/05/yes-keyword-search-is-about-to-hit-its-breaking-point/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.helioid.com/2008/05/yes-keyword-search-is-about-to-hit-its-breaking-point/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keyword search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.helioid.net/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A debate rippled across a few tech blog sites following Erick Schonfeld's reiteration, a few weeks ago, of some claims made by Nova Spivack concerning the fate of traditional keyword search.  As Schonfeld explains, Spivack is of the opinion that as the number of web pages a search engine has to sift through explodes exponentially, the efficacy of a simple keyword search will drop off. Spivack himself explains the problem as follows:

"Keyword search engines return haystacks, but what we really are looking for are the needles. The problem with keyword search such as Google's approach is that only highly cited pages make it into the top results. You get a huge pile of results, but the page you want &#8212; the 'needle' you are looking for &#8212; may not be highly cited by other pages and so it does not appear on the first page. This is because keyword search engines don't understand your question, they just find pages that match the words in your question."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.helioid.com/2008/05/yes-keyword-search-is-about-to-hit-its-breaking-point/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

